Monday, November 06, 2006 @1:05 am
3 years since US invade Iraq, 5 years after 911, millions of innocent lives taken, thousands of cases of violence and abuse of power, assasinations...
Saddam Hussein is finally sentenced to death.
He still firmly believes in what he does and his grounds for doing so. In this respect, he is admirable, and so is Adolf Hitler.
This is not to condone anything they've done, neither is this defending them. But if these madmen really believed what they did was the right thing to do, these hardened men, who are we to condemn them?
We condemn them because of the harm they've done to humanity, we condemn them for having no qualms about wiping out an entire population, we condemn them for their ideals. But who are we to say that they are bad men?
If they had not killed, if they had just championed their causes non-violently, would we think the same way? For all we know, we are the mad people and there are only a few sane people on earth.
Maybe, those in mental hospitals are really the sane ones. They think all the rest of the world is crazy. Who is qualified to say who is right or wrong? Who is to define what being sane is?
Haha, I don't take KI, but the above may be an inspiration for KI people's IRs?
Nach ein Jahr
Haben wir noch mal gesprochen
Magst du immer noch mich?
Ich weiss nicht ob ich dich immer noch moegt
Was werde ich sagen
Wenn dich ja antwortet?
Aber warum denke ich so
Ich weiss nicht ob dich mich immer noch moegt.
Gluecklicheweise verstehst du Deutsch nicht.
OP in less than 48 hours.
Wish me luck!
you know you love me